Dear Jon Ronson

You probably Google your name. I might too, if I were a Slighty Famous Person and so inclined. So if you do happen to be reading this, please know that the following written expression of my increasingly hard to repress desire to come at you with a box of something microscopic and flesh-eating isn't personal.

I'm sure you're a very nice person. That's what your columns are all about, after all. A nice, nice person and his quirky, quirky life. Although, maybe this terribly faux-naif gee-whiz thing you've got going on that's so persistantly irritating is simply a facade and you're really a domineering, wife-tormenting boor with seventy different ringtones on his mobile who actually cant stand the sight of his awfully, awfully winsome son. I think I'd really end up liking what you write if that turned out to be the case. Get pictured falling out of a cheap suburban nightclub at 5 am with one hand in a bag of coke and the other in a transvestite hooker in the next six months and I'll take it all back.

I apologise for this. I appreciate how perverse it is. I doubt that even the accumulated outrages of every single twentieth century dictator simultaneously performed upon my very doorstep one wet Tuesday night could move me to public action, but a single one of your cutesily self-deprecating sentences would happily see me in the middle of Trafalgar Square with a firm grip on the back of your neck, rubbing your forehead joyfully up and down the base of Nelson's Column until the water cannons arrive to prise me loose.

I've tried, God knows, to embrace your annoyingly forced short sentences and be the kind of person that could enjoy the wacky yet relatable adventures of the wide-eyed innocent without dry heaving. I remember too well the disgusted intakes of breath and averted glances that met my admission of last year that I didn't really like Douglas Adams and am not keen to recreate those unspoken but clearly present accusations that I if I feel like that then well, I might as well be out drowning kittens or rubbing myself against children on the swings. But I can't help it. I've shredded so many Guardian Weekend supplements in white-hot squinting rage that I have to have a public outet for this irrational ire.

I am one of the scant 0.000001% of bloggers who don't actually secretly yearn to be a writer. I don't think I could do any better. But still, I'd quite like you to be suddenly struck by something if not fatal then at least immediately silencing. And maybe slightly itchy. You understand, I'm sure. You're so very nice.

Love,

J

14 September 2006

Comments

It seems very strange that you felt the need to write this. Are you somehow troubled?

God you're sexy when you're angry

[am now worried hunky boyfriend will smash my face in for saying such a thing ... but it's true ... and I'm only flirting ... nothing wrong with flirting ... please don't smash my face in ... I am rubbish at fighting]

Dear Jon Ronson,

I love you. Don't listen to this crazy lady, you Slighty you.

Mike xxx

I must confess I quite enjoyed his book about the goat-starers. It kept me company during the long hours waiting in line outside the QI studios this summer.

Where do you stand on Michael Hodges?

You're all comprehensively strange and wrong, except of course for Andre who displays nothing less than impeccable taste.

I don't feel one way or another about Michael Hodges; sometimes he pleases me by agreeing with my worldview, sometimes he does the opposite. But he never moves me to physical violence, despite his disagreeable spectacles.

Jon Ronson... he's not that fat italian porn star with the greasy curly hair is he?

And Andre, I couldn't smash your face in for calling me hunky, that'd be rude. Instead I snap your favorite felt tip pen and crumple your latest doodle.

Who the fuck is Don Johnson.. er... Rob Lawson.. ohh wossisname again??

Consider me unmoved, either by the man or the image of you rubbing up and down a large column.

And yes, I lied about the second bit that MAY move me. Depending on a large number of factors that I refuse to discuss here. And rubber.

I too hate John Ronson. I hate him with a feverish passion. There. I said it.

I refuse to call him Jon. John John John.

Excellent piece, articulating my dislike for his column perfectly. Thank you for saving me the bother of doing so myself.

You realize of course that now I'm going to have to go find his column and read it, just to see what has you so upset. That's just the kind of girl I am.

D: I promise never to flirt again ... please don't snap my felt tip pens... they are my only friends.

Where do you stand on Michael Hodges?

The breastbone is ideal, I find.

Be grateful for Ronson's weekly supperation.

It rallies people to our flag.

Destroy all Ronsons!

If you really do find yourself in that 0.000001% of bloggers who don't yearn to be a writer Pandemian, then why this embittered response to Jon Ronson, whose only offence, as far as I can tell from your embarrassingly self-indulgent tirade, has been to write a weekly column containing 500 engaging, finely-crafted and amusingly self-effacing words about his family life.. oh and to get paid for it by a national newspaper.

As one of the (let's think now) 99.99999% of bloggers who do aspire to gain the respect of their peers through their writing, let me just say I wish I had an ounce of Ronson's talent, or the dedication to journalistic craft he has shown throughout a lifetime dedicated to writing.

Here I land on your blog, quite anonymously from someone's kinja, and what do I find but five yes five of my closest blogpals. Who had never once mentioned this weblog, ever over several years. I think you should have a word with them.

(Recovering from shock.) But back to the point, and the truth truly can be stranger than fiction.

About seven years ago, Jon Ronson did Google his name, (or the pre-Google thingies which where all there were then), and thus found himself on my site and reading my appreciations of his great work.

He was kind enough to write. To praise even my own modest scribbles. An email friendship grew. He contracted me to design his .com. (It didn't happen.) We met at the Edinburgh book festival.

As you can guess, I'm with jonathan just above, especially his last sentence. Jon Ronson is supreme - a giant amongst light writers. One of the funniest men in print I can ever recall.

Your own site isn't three bad, either. I might well return. (Still v cross at andre, mike, Gordon and PB). Might let Froosh off as she's new.

Embittered! Yes! Embrarrassingly self-indulgent! Oooh! More! More! Critique me! I live for the recognition!

Peter - I'm new, sort of. Perhaps you knew Green Fairy - I certainly know of you!

Well, hello Jack. Just after the above I checked your profile and all was clear.

Love the blog ;)

Interesting you being the only person I've (n)ever met who doesn't worship at the Ronson shrine. Next you'll be saying you didn't love Julie when she was at the Guardian.

This comments section is starting to smell decidedly of socks.

"Jon Ronson is supreme - a giant amongst light writers. One of the funniest men in print I can ever recall."

Seriously? Might I suggest you broaden your reading horizons? Perhaps you'd be able to muster a better comeback than "you're just jealous!"

Well I'm sure he's a big fan of yours, poppet.

Or was.

It's funny, I do like his column very much, and it's still one of the first things I read of a Saturday, but yeah, I admit, I find myself increasingly shouting at it. But then, who DOESN'T enjoy shouting at bits of paper?

It's surely most of the reason that bits of paper exist...

Oh, and speaking of which. As part that lucky 0.00001% who don't care much for writing for a living - do you think you might be good enough to pass any further National Sunday newspaper commissions to those of us that do?

Ta muchly, duck...

Argh! No, don't bring Julie Birchill into this or I'll be getting really offensive.

Look, I know I'm fat and live in Brighton, but I wouldn't go that far, D...

Oh you were talking about Peter.

Dear NotABlog

Don't tell me to broaden my reading horizons until you've learned to read yourself. There isn't one comment here saying or even implying "you're just jealous".

I am angered that you try to conflate that with the words I did actually write.

Get spectacles. The only socks here are the ones hanging from your blinkers.

I'm glad to say I don't know who you are talking about or why, and this whole post and it's comments wizzed far above my head.

I don't even have a sleazy comment.

*SHOCK*

You dare sully the name of Douglas Adams? Isn't that an act of treason?

I think he's a knobber, as it goes. Just do, regardless of whether he can or can't write and that. I would probably try and set his hair on fire if I met him, and he's got a stupid voice. I like that Craig Brown though. He's good.

Post a comment