pandemian




Jack. Female. London.

Black and white and read all over.

rss : email : delicious : flickr : twitter





Bedizen

18 June 2007


It was with time to kill and not a small amount of driving lesson to put off that this afternoon, I went shopping.

I have had visions - oh such visions! - of summer finally arriving and me with a glass of something 23% proof in one hand and an unpronounceable French cheese in the other, tripping lightly over Hampstead Heath or Primrose Hill in something flighty, light and attractively unsuitable for playing frisbee. A cross between Holly Golightly and a ten dollar a night hooker who reads Sartre in her spare time, if you will.

But I am wise. I know that two hours of trawling shops in the sunshine is likely to make you forget all objectives and come back with a pair of seventies slingbacks in royal blue instead. I go for a cup of tea and write the following forbidden words on a napkin, lavishly illustrated with the word NO in various typefaces, large red circles with crosses through them and painstakingly accurate drawings of several UR-100N intercontinental ballistic missiles landing neatly on warehouses full of Topshop clothes somewhere just north of Staines.

Orange Teal Patterned Gypsy Embroidered Footless tights Neon Skinny fit Sequinned Eighties Ethnic Kate Moss Striped Playsuit Magenta Bell sleeves Smock Cowboy Beaded Metallic Push up Slogans Brand names Irony
Pre-vintaged ("We gave your clothes personality so you don't have to!")

After three packets of biscotti and fifteen minutes of furious squinting I arrive at the only purchase possibility my somewhat restricted taste and refusal to buy into arbitrarily designated notions of style has left me with. I write the words

A BLACK DRESS

on the reverse of the napkin and smile benevolently, leaving my simple yet sage words of fashion advice behind for the next occupants of my table to be enlightened by before striding my way confidently back to the nearest shop.

Dress 1 assumed I was either 5'3" or for reasons unknown absolutely needed to display ten inches of buttock.
Dress 2 required me to maintain the perfectly vertical at all times or run the risk of loosing my breasts upon any or all random passers by.
Dress 3 looked familiar; only after 10 minutes of deliberation did I realise it was my old school uniform.
Dress 5 required pants of such spectacular and convoluted design they haven't yet been invented.
Dress 6 seemed okay at first but on closer inspection had the word 'naughty' picked out in pink diamanté across the ass and I couldn't, I just couldn't.
Dress 7 contained an unacceptably high spandex content.
Dress 8 made me look like Patrick Moore.

Dresses 9 to 12 passed in an increasingly opaque red mist and by the time I got to dress 13 and I was seriously considering buying it even though it was £225 I knew I had to stop. I put the dresses down carefully and walked away from the changing room and out on to the street in a graceful and collected manner, only pausing once to gently assault a rail full of orange and yellow swirled bandeau tops.

I will be the one in Regent's Park this July in tweed work trousers and a peevish expression.

comments


Aha, a mystery: what happened to Dress No. 4 ?

And why isn't gingham on the No-No list?

posted by Chris | 19 June 2007



Dress one sounded bestest

i luv shopping me

what happened to dress 4?

PICTURES!!!

posted by andre | 19 June 2007



Good morrow to you Jack. I am a first time commenter, but a long time reader... In the days of the Green Fairy, I seem to remember you posting a pic of the beautiful back tattoo you sport. I wonder, if I ask very nicely, if you would be kind enough to post it again, or perhaps a link to said item, please? It was a thing of beauty, and I am considering a large back piece myself, but am unsure. (I won't plagiarise it, honest... there's no point if it's not original, for me...)

I do enjoy your pages. You are a comic treasure, and a woman of steel.

I thank you.

posted by Little Vix | 19 June 2007



In responding to this post, I think I might try practising at being a devoted husband.

"They all look lovely, darling. Yes. Particularly Dress 14. What do you mean, there's no Dress 14? Oh, do I mean Dress 1? Well, I don't know. They all look the same to me. Oh, and no, your bum doesn't look big in any of them."

I am obviously cut out for this lark.

[Has Mr Jerdin's Tourette's kicked in again?]

posted by An Unreliable Witness | 19 June 2007



Dress 4 was the slutty one wasn't it.

You bought dress 4 didn't you.

posted by Adrian Sevitz | 19 June 2007



Dress number 4 was obviously the perfect mix of Audrey Hepburn and Mata Hari all for under a tenner and therefore DOES NOT EXIST.

posted by Jack | 20 June 2007



I thought you spent the afternoon at the track blowing a monkey on a dog.

posted by D | 20 June 2007



How did you know I read Sartre?!

posted by Cheerful One | 20 June 2007



Oh Thank You!

* tries hard to erase mental image of Patrick Moore in a little black dress which is now burned onto the synapses *

posted by Alan | 20 June 2007



you did well to persevere, hate shopping me, hate it hate it hate it

posted by peach | 21 June 2007



I know nothing of womens clothing but did note that Madonna's "collection" for H & M was apparently very swiftly pulled and labelled clearance. Other than that, they have done well. I like your writing style though.

More please...

P.S. Ten inches of buttock, my my, that sounds like alot! ;-)

posted by mooch | 21 June 2007



Lately, I only seem able to find things I like online. Even the online shops I look at which have real-life counterparts in my local town have better stock than the shop. You also don't have to deal with crowds, or a lack of your size - but you don't get to try things on. So I suppose it cuts both ways.

posted by Kat | 21 June 2007



I think we were in Paris when the Madonna H&M collection was released. They were fighting each other tooth and claw to buy the stuff. Over here in the UK though the reception seemed pretty lukewarm, like it was just another line with a different name.

posted by D | 22 June 2007



post a comment